Is polygamy a success?
While at the library yesterday hunting through old books for Wondermark source material, I came across this article in the 1891 volume of a magazine called The Illustrated American. Entitled “Is Polygamy a Success?”, it’s letters from readers responding to a previous article written by a self-described “ex-Mormon,” in which the writer denounces Mormonism with claims that its members practice polygamy.
These letters were just the beginning of a huge outcry by Mormons and others against the magazine. In later issues, the editors of The Illustrated American comment on a libel suit brought against them by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints; later still, they print a letter from Wilford Woodruff, the president of the church at that time, who defends the Church against what he perceives as mischaracterizations in the article by the “ex-Mormon.” The whole exchange is fascinating, because it really shows how fiercely polygamy was a hot-button issue for religious leaders at the time.
Due to time constraints, I didn’t scan pages from the later issues; anyone interested in this particular wrinkle in the history of the Mormon church can look up 1891 issues of The Illustrated American. But this letters column, in which many parties defend polygamy, was particularly interesting to me because of the window it affords into the state of family relationships in the late 19th Century — how the institution of marriage used to be considered, what’s changed, and interestingly, what hasn’t (how many wives today still feel like “school-masters” treating their husbands like “truant pupils”?).
For many months I’ve wanted to do a regular “True Stuff from Old Books” series, but it takes a lot of time to scan and upload stuff…hopefully I’ll be able to post more interesting tidbits in the future.
« A.R.A.C.H.N.I.D. Commercial | Presenting: Expendable. »
January 31st, 2008 at 9:07 am
This topic intersects the prospect of “Cuckold,” in my opinion. If a person needs an infinite value of combinations/permutations for amusement, perhaps he can find such treasures in a promiscuous, insatiable wife. Just discussing polygamy, I’m already touching masochism. I think the public is bored with the ideal of a monogamous wife docile to a revered patriarch. So, pologamy fits right in with the female ’species’ as the public seems to further embrace the wanton. Feminism is growing in popularity.
Strange their isn’t a Mormon Snow White duchess married to seven dwarfs? With the proliferation of penis enlargement pills, I wonder why penis reduction haven’t been introduced? There is already breast reduction; I’m not covering sex change, please! Just for those so cursed to be well endowed can never enjoy the best benefits of cuckolding, they can buy the “penis evaporator” at Walgreens. Then, when they feel inferior, take the “penis enlargement.”
Women could take “clitoris enlargement” and make more permutations.
Note, I am a man, not a femme posing as a stud. Hope this post isn’t inappropriate. It’s quite stressful continually minimizing the window as my female boss walks by.
Max